Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-04-18 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-04-18 Senate Journal Page 3214 SB 7 Message dated and received April 17 was read, stating: Dear President Pearce: Under the authority of Art. II, sec. 15, of the Alaska Constitution, I have vetoed the following bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am H An Act relating to the University of Alaska and university land and authorizing the University of Alaska to select additional state land. The bill provides for the selection and transfer of 260,000 acres of state land to the University of Alaska. It is the latest of several efforts since statehood to obtain more land for the university system as a revenue-raising means. Throughout my term as governor, I have strongly supported the university. I have proposed healthy operating budget increases, fought for adequate capital funding for university facilities, worked to encourage Alaskas best and brightest students to attend Alaskas university and obtained a long-term source of funding for the university through the Charter with BP Amoco. However, this bill is the wrong approach toward adequate resources for the university. As I did in 1995 and 1996, former Alaska Governor Bill Egan vetoed similar legislation in 1959. 2000-04-18 Senate Journal Page 3215 SB 7 As Governor Egan noted in his veto of a university lands bill, this measure is inconsistent with constitutional concepts and not in the public interest. I agree with Governor Egan regarding the concept of earmarking state lands when he said: . . . can we in good conscience limit the practice to the University? Why not similar provision for common schools, public building, hospitals, penal institutions, highways, airports, aid to dependent children, and so on throughout the entire list of important state functions? I continue to believe the basic premise of the bill, transfer of state land to the university for the purpose of raising revenue, is not in the best interest of the state. It is an inefficient and unsuccessful way to secure reliable funding for the university. Instead, this bill will complicate state land management, contribute to significant land use conflicts, and likely lead to years of litigation reminiscent of the Mental Health Trust Lands case. Instead of a futile attempt to generate revenue for the university through the grant of additional state land, I have long worked for adequate resources for higher education. For the coming year, I proposed the largest increase ever - $16.9 million for the University of Alaskas operating budget. As a result of the Charter my administration negotiated between the State, BP Amoco and Phillips Petroleum Company, the university also will realize income estimated at $2.8 million each year. And, as I have in the past, I support an appropriation of additional federal lands to the university consistent with land grants offered in other states. The University of Alaska has a broad mission of educating and training Alaskans for future economic and civic responsibilities, for vital research in the public interest and for public service. Despite this veto, I remain open and willing to work with the university and its supporters on reasonable means to advance that mission. 2000-04-18 Senate Journal Page 3216 SB 7 But a grant of state land as proposed in this bill will not solve the university's immediate financial needs and, for the policy reasons expressed above, I must veto this legislation. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor